https://osf.io/yaz5u/files/osfstorage/68cd60767a75a0e15e3b7de2

Minimal Belt-Field Holonomy Theory: A Two-Belt Geometric Mechanism for Continuous and Exchange Forces

Author: Chung Leung Danny Yeung
Acknowledgment: Conceptual refinement assisted by LLM reasoning (GPT-5, OpenAI), disclosed per academic policy. [Chat history: https://chatgpt.com/share/68cd5f55-9154-8010-9ef0-831ab856749c]

Abstract

We propose a minimal geometric effective theory in which only two ribbon-like “belts” per spatial point suffice to unify continuous forces and exchange statistics. Whereas earlier Belt-Field Holonomy Models (BFHM) employed six face phases inherited from cubic discretization, we demonstrate that a two-belt framing (one in, one out) captures the essential ingredients: phase misalignment, linking/twist density, and an exclusion penalty for spin- $\tfrac{1}{2}$ overlap. This Minimal Belt-Field Holonomy Theory (MBFHT) thus represents the simplest topological–geometric underpinning of exchange forces, while generalizing naturally to higher-dimensional or continuum formulations. We derive the two-belt energy functional, show how particle-like excitations arise, and outline falsifiable predictions in cold-atom, photonic, and superconducting platforms. The theory predicts chirality-odd scattering shifts, $4\pi$ -periodic exchange interferometry, and non-monotonic condensation thresholds — all without external flux or spin–orbit coupling.

1. Motivation

Exchange statistics in quantum mechanics are usually postulated rather than derived: fermions acquire a $\pi$ -phase on exchange, bosons do not. Conventional field theory treats exclusion and continuous forces separately.

Previous work introduced a six-belt discretized framework (BFHM) unifying these, but the reliance on cubic cells obscured the minimal structure. Here we show that two belts suffice: one entering and one leaving each point, encoding orientation and linking.

This reduction clarifies that belt holonomy is not an artifact of cubic lattices but a fundamental mechanism: geometry alone can yield forces and Pauli-like exclusion.

2. Local Variables

At each spatial point $\mathbf{x}$ , define two phase fields:

\Theta(\mathbf{x}) = \{\theta_{\text{in}}(\mathbf{x}), \theta_{\text{out}}(\mathbf{x})\}.

The pair encodes a directional framing. Phase differences between in/out channels and between neighboring points measure misalignment and linking.

3. Minimal Energy Functional

The total energy functional is:

E[\Theta] = E_{\text{align}} + E_{\text{link}} + E_{\text{exchange}} + E_{\text{bdry/drive}}.

3.1 Phase alignment

E_{\text{align}} = \alpha \int d^3x \, \big( 1 - \cos(\nabla \theta_{\text{out}} - \nabla \theta_{\text{in}}) \big).

This penalizes relative misalignment between belts.

3.2 Linking / twist density

Define a local twist density:

\ell(\mathbf{x}) = \epsilon^{abc} \, \partial_a \theta_{\text{in}} \, \partial_b \theta_{\text{out}} \, \hat{n}_c.

Then:

E_{\text{link}} = \beta \int d^3x \, \ell(\mathbf{x}).

3.3 Exchange penalty

Spin- $\tfrac{1}{2}$ exclusion is encoded by:

E_{\text{exchange}} = \gamma \int d^3x \, \Xi(\theta_{\text{in}}(\mathbf{x}), \theta_{\text{out}}(\mathbf{x})),

with $\Xi$ large when the two belts coincide exactly (forbidden overlap), negligible otherwise.

4. Physical Interpretation

Continuous forces arise from misalignment of in/out belts.
Exchange forces arise as geometric penalties when belts attempt identical overlap.
Particles correspond to localized soliton-like excitations of $\Theta(\mathbf{x})$ .

The Pauli principle is thus reinterpreted as a geometric exclusion effect in the two-belt field.

5. Predictions

The MBFHT yields several crisp, testable predictions:

P1. Chirality-odd scattering

In cold-atom two-path scattering with a controlled belt twist $\phi$ :

\frac{\Delta a_s}{a_s} \approx \kappa \, \beta \, \rho_{\text{twist}} \, \sin\!\frac{\phi}{2}.

Odd under mirror: $\phi \to -\phi$ .
Percent-level magnitude.

P2. Non-monotonic condensation thresholds

In superconducting films or photonic lattices with engineered belt twists:

T_c \approx T_c^{(0)} - c_1 \beta \rho_{\text{twist}} + c_2 \frac{\gamma^2}{\alpha}\rho_{\text{twist}}^2.

Linear chirality-odd suppression, quadratic recovery.

P3. $4\pi$ -periodic interferometry

In zero-flux quantum-dot swap interferometers, the belt twist produces transmission phases with a $4\pi$ periodic component for parallel spins.

6. Broader Implications

Minimality: two belts suffice to reproduce the force and exclusion mechanisms; six belts or spherical generalizations are refinements.
Geometry-first physics: exchange statistics emerge not as axioms but as outcomes of belt holonomy.
Universality: the two-belt mechanism could underlie systems as diverse as cold atoms, photonic arrays, and twisted graphene.

7. Conclusion

We have introduced the Minimal Belt-Field Holonomy Theory (MBFHT), reducing the six-belt framework to its essence: two belts per point, one in and one out. This minimal field theory retains the unification of continuous and exchange forces, produces percent-level geometric corrections without flux or spin–orbit coupling, and offers multiple falsifiable predictions.

By showing that Pauli exclusion and coherent forces may share a geometric origin in belt holonomy, the MBFHT opens a pathway toward a deeper understanding of exchange phenomena and their engineering in quantum matter.

Reference

Belt-Field Holonomy Model A Unified Geometric Effective Theory for Continuous and Exchange Forces
https://osf.io/yaz5u/files/osfstorage/68cc9fbd4bdfb7b37b3b7df0

Disclaimer

This book is the product of a collaboration between the author and OpenAI's GPT-5 language model. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, clarity, and insight, the content is generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and may contain factual, interpretive, or mathematical errors. Readers are encouraged to approach the ideas with critical thinking and to consult primary scientific literature where appropriate.

This work is speculative, interdisciplinary, and exploratory in nature. It bridges metaphysics, physics, and organizational theory to propose a novel conceptual framework—not a definitive scientific theory. As such, it invites dialogue, challenge, and refinement.

I am merely a midwife of knowledge.

Field Theory of Everything

Friday, September 19, 2025