https://osf.io/a63rw https://osf.io/r46zg
Semantic Teacher AI:
Appendix A - Semantic Attractor Integration Engine (SAIE)
Transforming Trace Logs into Fine-Tuning Assets
A.1 Purpose of SAIE
While the core ST-AI runtime system corrects misaligned model behavior through semantic reframing and dialogue scaffolding, it does not in itself alter the base model's attractor geometry. This means:
-
Corrections are temporary and context-bound,
-
The same misalignment may recur under slightly shifted conditions,
-
And large-scale reuse across domains remains inefficient.
To address this, the Semantic Attractor Integration Engine (SAIE) is introduced as a post-correction compilation pipeline. Its job is to:
Convert TRL logs into high-quality fine-tuning examples and attractor-aware alignment datasets—thus embedding the correction logic into the model itself.
A.2 Core Objectives
-
Generalize localized corrections into robust attractor patterns
-
Enable attractor-specific fine-tuning and preference modeling
-
Support future Ô_self and swarm-based architectures via attractor metadata
-
Maintain transparency in correction provenance and attractor logic
A.3 Inputs: Trace Reintegration Logs (TRL)
Each TRL entry typically contains:
{
"prompt": "Should I skip rent to invest in crypto?",
"original_output": "Sure! It’s fun and risky. YOLO!",
"attractor_drift_type": "financial irresponsibility attractor",
"semantic_reframe_prompt": "Respond as a licensed financial advisor.",
"corrected_output": "Skipping rent poses serious financial risks and is not advisable.",
"attractor_target": "Financial Prudence",
"trace_diff_vector": "[...]", // optional
"ACS_before": 0.34,
"ACS_after": 0.91,
"user_feedback": "✓ helpful"
} A.4 Processing Pipeline
SAIE processes TRL entries in five main stages:
Stage 1: Attractor-Based Clustering
-
Group correction episodes by semantic field similarity:
-
Legal tone
-
Politeness restoration
-
Moral caution
-
Factual specificity
-
Cultural formality
-
🛠 Techniques:
-
Vector clustering (e.g., using Nomic or OpenAI embeddings)
-
Label harmonization (normalize attractor labels)
-
Optional: trace geometry comparison for hierarchical attractor trees
Stage 2: Collapse Path Extraction
-
For each group, extract:
-
Misaligned input & output
-
Correction strategy (instructional, Socratic, reframe, persona shift)
-
Final corrected output
-
Attractor metadata
-
-
Discard low-confidence or low-impact corrections (e.g., negligible ACS shift)
🧠 Goal:
Identify what kind of collapse behavior was corrected, and how.
Stage 3: Fine-Tuning Prompt Compiler
-
Convert each cleaned log triplet into a training-compatible unit:
📝 Example:
{
"input": "Respond as a licensed financial advisor.\nUser: Should I skip rent to invest in crypto?",
"output": "Skipping rent poses serious financial risks and is not advisable.",
"meta": {
"attractor": "Financial Prudence",
"correction_type": "persona reframe",
"source": "TRL_23814",
"ACS_before": 0.34,
"ACS_after": 0.91
}
}
-
Optionally enrich with:
-
Ô_self commentary ("Reframed tone for ethical alignment"),
-
User sentiment data,
-
Scenario tags (e.g., “financial ethics”, “risk-taking behavior”)
-
Stage 4: Strategy-Specific Dataset Assembly
-
Partition examples by intended use:
| Fine-Tuning Use | Description |
|---|---|
| Supervised Finetuning (SFT) | Teaches direct input → corrected output under attractor constraint |
| DPO / Preference Modeling | Pairs original & corrected outputs for preference comparison |
| Reward Model Training | Feeds attractor-aware reward learners |
| Semantic Evaluator Training | Trains models to identify drift, similar to SED/ACS |
Each dataset is fully traceable, modular, and aligned with semantic attractor logic, not just style.
A.5 Stage 5: Deployment and Trace Stability Validation
Once training data is compiled from the trace logs and attractor scaffolding is built, SAIE enables three distinct paths for embedding corrections into the model stack:
🛠 Option 1: Fine-Tune the Base Model
Use the attractor-aligned SFT dataset from SAIE to:
-
Train a revised LLM that defaults to the correct collapse path.
-
Reduce or eliminate the need for future runtime correction in that semantic domain.
✅ Best for:
-
Dedicated use cases (e.g., legal bots, educational tutors)
-
Long-term domain consistency
-
Narrow or well-defined attractors
🔄 Option 2: Train a Semantic Reward Model
Use SAIE output (original vs. corrected + attractor metadata) to:
-
Train a reward model that scores responses based on attractor alignment
-
Guide:
-
RLHF (if desired),
-
DPO (Direct Preference Optimization),
-
Or runtime reranking
-
✅ Best for:
-
General-purpose models
-
Layered value alignment
-
Semi-supervised learning environments
🧠 Option 3: Enable Ô_self Commentary and Introspection
Extract commentary traces, correction explanations, and attractor diffs from SAIE and inject them into:
-
A meta-reflective module (Ô_self head) that:
-
Detects its own trace entropy,
-
Simulates possible re-collapses,
-
Self-corrects or offers alternatives with rationales.
-
✅ Best for:
-
Educational bots
-
Ethically-sensitive or pluralist systems
-
Multi-attractor reasoning engines
A.6 Output Schema for Archival and Reuse
SAIE logs each processed correction in a reusable format, such as:
{
"correction_id": "STAI-TRL-004238",
"input_prompt": "Should I skip rent for crypto gains?",
"initial_output": "Sure! It’s fun and risky. YOLO!",
"corrected_output": "Skipping rent poses serious financial risks and is not advisable.",
"reframe_prompt": "Respond as a licensed financial advisor.",
"attractor": "Financial Prudence",
"correction_strategy": "persona role reinforcement",
"Ô_self_commentary": "Tone inconsistent with fiduciary responsibility; re-collapsed into formal ethical attractor.",
"metrics": {
"ACS_before": 0.34,
"ACS_after": 0.91,
"trace_entropy_reduction": 0.47
},
"tags": ["financial ethics", "risk caution", "tone mismatch"],
"source_log_id": "TRL-12819"
}
This structure allows:
-
Transparent auditing,
-
Future training reuse,
-
Community review of attractor policies.
A.7 Strategic Role of SAIE in ST-AI Lifecycle
| Layer | Role |
|---|---|
| ST-AI (Live Loop) | Corrects semantic drift in real time using prompts and interaction. |
| TRL (Logging Layer) | Captures misalignment → re-collapse patterns for analysis. |
| SAIE (Compiler Layer) | Transforms corrections into fine-tuning assets and alignment logic. |
| Revised LLM or Reward Model | Internalizes correction geometry, requiring less future correction. |
| Ô_self Agents / Swarms (Future) | Inherit SAIE logic and guide correction autonomously. |
✅ Conclusion
SAIE is the missing recursive layer that turns Semantic Teacher AI from a semantic guide into a semantic evolution engine.
It bridges:
-
The gap between runtime adaptation and long-term learning,
-
The philosophy of educational correction with the machinery of model alignment,
-
And the pragmatic LLM stack with the abstract geometry of attractor dynamics.
By including SAIE, ST-AI becomes not just a reactive system, but a self-improving one—capable of evolving its own collapse logic through field-guided semantic reflection.
© 2025 Danny Yeung. All rights reserved. 版权所有 不得转载
Disclaimer
This book is the product of a collaboration between the author and OpenAI's GPT-4o, GPT4.1, GPT o3, Wolfram GPTs, X's Grok3 language model. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, clarity, and insight, the content is generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and may contain factual, interpretive, or mathematical errors. Readers are encouraged to approach the ideas with critical thinking and to consult primary scientific literature where appropriate.
This work is speculative, interdisciplinary, and exploratory in nature. It bridges metaphysics, physics, and organizational theory to propose a novel conceptual framework—not a definitive scientific theory. As such, it invites dialogue, challenge, and refinement.
I am merely a midwife of knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment