https://osf.io/hj8kd/files/osfstorage/69a2e32f62162f30285f4b68

NotebookLM Summarized: Why LLMs Suddenly ‘Understand’: A Protocol-Compiled Regime-Transition Model Integrating Fourier-Mode Selection, CWA Macro Coherence, SMFT Projection, and the PORE Ξ-Stack

 

Navigating the Latent Landscape: A Primer on the Minimal Intrinsic Triple (ρ, γ, τ)

1. Introduction: The Protocol-Relative Regime Transition

In the engineering of Large Language Models (LLMs), "sudden understanding" is frequently misinterpreted as a mystical leap in capability—a "magic jump" occurring without warning. From the perspective of Mechanistic Interpretability, this is a category error. Capabilities are not metaphysically given; they are protocol-relative regime transitions.

Under the "Reader Contract" of this framework, understanding is an effective regularity that exists only under a declared Protocol P. This protocol defines the boundaries of the system, the observation maps used to log its state, and the interventions applied. To move beyond pop-science narratives, we enforce the Anti-Handwaving Constraint: any explanation of model behavior must be reconstructible from the protocol-bound log z[n] using compiled observables.

Key Insight: Sudden Understanding Operationally, "Sudden Understanding" is defined as a protocol-relative event where a model’s generalization score G(t) crosses a specific threshold \Theta(P) with a steep slope under a fixed training protocol P. It is a measurable crossing of a Critical Surface (\Sigma_c) in order-parameter space, not a change in the model’s "essence."

2. The Trinity of Learning: The Minimal Intrinsic Triple (Ξ)

To track a model's trajectory, we compile high-dimensional weights into the Minimal Intrinsic Triple \Xi(t) = (\rho(t), \gamma(t), \tau(t)). These are role-defined coordinates that act as a stable summary of the model's internal regime.

Technical Symbol & Name	The Metaphor	The "So What?" for the Learner
\rho (rho) — Representational Mass	Occupancy/Density of Structure	Tracks the concentration of predictive power into stable directions. High \rho indicates the model has moved from "dilute" quirks to "loaded" reusable structure.
\gamma (gamma) — Domain-Lock/Coherence	Lock-in/Coherence	Defines the strength of the algorithmic "trap." It separates weakly constrained diffusion from strongly locked trapping, where sub-modules reinforce a shared basis.
\tau (tau) — Agitation	Noise/Dephasing	The "governor" of the grokking delay. High \tau smears internal structure. If \tau is not lowered, the transition to understanding remains stalled indefinitely.

Operational Readings:

• \rho (Mass): Measured via spectral concentration—how much energy is packed into the top singular values of weight matrices.
• \gamma (Lock-in): Measured via cross-module agreement—the degree to which different layers or heads carry consistent, redundant information.
• \tau (Agitation): Measured via the volatility of feature directions (churn) and the timescale separation between fitting and generalization.

3. Micro-Mechanics: The Coupled Flow of Mode Competition

At the micro-level, understanding is a "winner-take-most" competition between internal hypotheses, or Modes. We track each candidate mode k using two variables: Amplitude (A_k) and Mismatch (D_k).

The "suddenness" of learning is driven by a Positive Feedback Loop known as the Coupled Flow:

1. Alignment-Gated Growth: Modes with smaller internal mismatch (D_k \approx 0) enjoy a fit advantage, allowing their amplitude (A_k) to grow.
2. Resource Dominance: As A_k grows, the mode increasingly dominates the gradients. The optimizer allocates more "corrective power" to this specific mode.
3. Decisive Collapse: This dominance causes the mismatch D_k to collapse toward zero even faster, which in turn accelerates the growth of A_k.

This feedback engine ensures that once a "good lottery ticket" (a mode with low initial D_k or high A_k) gains a slight lead, it rapidly consumes the unit’s representational capacity.

4. Macro-Stability: Collapse Without Alignment (CWA)

How does a model achieve macro-level predictability when its individual neurons remain messy and heterogeneous? This is the Paradox of the Crowd, resolved by the principle of Collapse Without Alignment.

The CWA Claim (Section 6.1) "Macro predictability can hold under micro heterogeneity... provided the macro is an additive projection."

The SNR Logic: Understanding occurs when the aggregate output Y (the "sum of votes") achieves a sufficient Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The scaling intuition is: SNR(Y) \approx \sqrt{M} \cdot \frac{|\mu|}{\sigma} Where M is the population size (width), \mu is the mean signal per unit, and \sigma is the individual noise.

• What CWA is: A statistical threshold event where collective cancellation of noise allows a stable macro signal to emerge from uncoordinated micro-parts.
• What CWA is not: A requirement for neurons to agree. Neurons can be diverse and "misaligned" in their internal phases, provided their errors cancel out in the final projection.

5. Crossing the Border: The Critical Surface (\Sigma_c)

The transition from memorization to generalization is a crossing of the Critical Surface, a level set in \Xi-space defined by the Generalization Control Index (GCI).

The Minimal Sufficient Inequality: \frac{\kappa(P) \cdot \rho(t) \cdot \gamma(t)}{\tau(t)} \geq \Theta(P) \Rightarrow \text{Generalization Regime}

The Generalization Control Index:

• Numerator (\kappa \cdot \rho \cdot \gamma): Representational Power. This represents the "Push"—the strength and coherence of the massed structure.
• Denominator (\tau): Dephasing Agitation. This represents the "Smear"—the noise preventing the structure from persisting.

\Sigma_c is not a fixed point but a boundary that shifts depending on the protocol P. To cross it, a developer must manage the ratio of Fit Pressure (\kappa) and the three intrinsic coordinates.

6. The Three Phases of the Learning Trajectory

The life cycle of a model's "understanding" is governed by the competition between Fit Pressure (Drive) and Structural Refinement (Cleanup).

Phase	Dominant Forces	Description
I: Memorization	Drive-dominant (\kappa \gg 1)	The model fit-drifts into a "dirty" representation. \rho increases as the model fits the data, but high dephasing (\tau) prevents generalization.
II: Transition	Competition/Cleanup (\kappa \approx 1)	Cleanup (weight decay/regularization) becomes decisive enough to remove residual noise. \gamma rises as modes lock in, and test performance "snaps" as the SNR threshold is crossed.
III: Refinement	Cleanup-dominant (\kappa \ll 1)	A slow polishing phase. The model prunes remaining non-feature noise, moving deeper into the sparse, generalizable solution.

7. The Teacher’s Control Board: The PORE Grammar

Developers influence the (\rho, \gamma, \tau) coordinates through four operator channels. These are validated via Gate 3: Probe Backreaction, ensuring measurements do not secretly act as interventions.

• PUMP: Fit-drive/resource injection. Sign: \partial \rho / \partial u_P > 0. Tell-tale Sign: Smooth, monotone growth in parameter norms and representational concentration.
• PROBE: Measurement/diagnostic readouts. Sign: Intended to be small/null on \Xi. Caution: If a probe pulse materially moves \Xi, Gate 3 fails; your measurement is "Reward Hacking" the model.
• SWITCH: Regime change trigger (e.g., schedule steps). Sign: Changes \tau through the switching channel. Tell-tale Sign: Discontinuities, kinks, or abrupt changes in the slope of the loss curve.
• COUPLE: Coherence/binding enforcement. Sign: \partial \gamma / \partial u_C > 0. Tell-tale Sign: Rising \gamma with reduced volatility and improved macro stability without requiring cross-unit coordination.

8. Conclusion: The Protocol is Your Object

"Understanding" is no longer a mystery to be admired, but a coordinate crossing to be engineered. To claim a model understands, you must be able to define its state within the Protocol Package P = (B, \Delta, h, u), where:

• B is your Boundary.
• \Delta is your Timebase.
• h is your Observation Map.
• u are your Operator Channels.

Glossary of Mastery:

• \rho (Mass): The spectral occupancy of reusable structure.
• \gamma (Coherence): The strength of algorithmic lock-in vs. diffusion.
• \tau (Agitation): The dephasing noise that governs the generalization delay.
• \Sigma_c (Critical Surface): The protocol-relative level set where macro-stability "snaps" into place.

In the final analysis, you do not study the model in isolation. The Protocol is your Object.

 

 

 

© 2026 Danny Yeung. All rights reserved. 版权所有 不得转载

 

Disclaimer

This book is the product of a collaboration between the author and OpenAI's GPT-5.2, X's Grok, Google's NotebookLM language model. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, clarity, and insight, the content is generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and may contain factual, interpretive, or mathematical errors. Readers are encouraged to approach the ideas with critical thinking and to consult primary scientific literature where appropriate.

This work is speculative, interdisciplinary, and exploratory in nature. It bridges metaphysics, physics, and organizational theory to propose a novel conceptual framework—not a definitive scientific theory. As such, it invites dialogue, challenge, and refinement.

I am merely a midwife of knowledge.