Collapse Without Alignment: A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence: Appendix F-TechNote: Mathematical and Algorithmic Foundations of the Three-Eigenvector Principle

https://osf.io/ke2mb/, https://osf.io/rsbzd, https://osf.io/rsbzd, https://osf.io/xjve7 https://osf.io/3c746

Collapse Without Alignment: 
A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence

 

Appendix F-TechNote: Mathematical and Algorithmic Foundations of the Three-Eigenvector Principle

---

F-TN.1 Overview and Purpose

This technical note supplements Appendix F by providing deeper mathematical detail and algorithmic guidance supporting the Three-Eigenvector Principle. It includes formal derivations, entropy proofs, covariance construction from collapse traces, and spectral arguments. While the main appendix presents the theory accessibly, this document serves those seeking full rigor or practical implementation paths.

Collapse Without Alignment: A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence: Appendix F The Three-Eigenvector Principle - A Canonical Core for Macro-Reality and AI World-Models

https://osf.io/ke2mb/, https://osf.io/rsbzd, https://osf.io/rsbzd, https://osf.io/xjve7 https://osf.io/3c746

This is an AI generated Article. 

Collapse Without Alignment: 
A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence

 

Appendix F:The Three-Eigenvector Principle -
A Canonical Core for Macro-Reality and AI World-Models

---

F.1 Introduction: From Collapse Geometry to Three Principal Axes

F.1.1 Problem Restatement & Context

Throughout this work, we have developed a rigorous argument for why all stable observer-experienced macro-realities—across physics, cognition, and artificial intelligence—are most coherently and stably realized as isotropic 3D worlds. In particular, Appendix E formalized the inevitability of the isotropic 3D configuration, demonstrating that only such a geometry minimizes semantic entropy, maximizes collapse efficiency, and guarantees universal observer consensus (see E.3 and E.5). This insight was rooted in both mathematical reasoning and evolutionary competition, culminating in the conclusion that all robust macro-level realities must converge on this “three-dimensional, isotropic attractor.”

Yet, a deeper structural question remains unaddressed:
Is this three-dimensionality merely a property of the geometric “container” (the world’s shape), or does it also imply a fundamental reduction of all high-level semantic complexity—no matter its origin—into exactly three principal axes of variation?

Put differently, if the universe we experience (and the macro-reality AI systems simulate) is stably 3D, does it follow that all macroscopic information, observer consensus, or collapse-encoded “worlds” must, at the core, be expressible as combinations of just three mutually orthogonal eigenvectors? This echoes the logic of linear algebra, where any 3D object or flow can be described in terms of its three principal directions, but goes further by asserting that this is not just a mathematical convenience—it is a universal law for the organization of stable meaning and perception.

The motivation for this inquiry is both theoretical and practical. If all high-dimensional collapse data, semantic fields, or world-models generated by AI or humans can ultimately be compressed into a “canonical triad” of principal directions, this offers profound simplification and universality in how reality can be represented, compressed, shared, or simulated. This would not only illuminate the underlying architecture of perception and consensus in biological and artificial observers, but also provide a concrete blueprint for designing the next generation of robust, scalable, and interpretable AI world-models.

---

F.1.2 Core Thesis & Scope

Core Thesis (Three-Eigenvector Principle):

Any observer-stable macro-reality—whether arising from natural semantic collapse, engineered simulation, or AI world-modeling—admits a unique, entropy-minimal decomposition into exactly three mutually-orthogonal principal eigenvectors, which fully specify its emergent 3D isotropic geometry and capture all macroscopic degrees of freedom relevant to stable consensus and simulation.

This principle does not claim that microscopic, local, or transient details are always reducible to three parameters; rather, it asserts that all globally stable, consensus-driven, or macro-observable structures collapse—under semantic, physical, or informational filtering—into a triadic basis. Any attempt to maintain more than three principal axes at the macro level either fails to persist (due to entropy and instability, as in E.3.2), or is rapidly compressed into the dominant three by natural or engineered processes.

Collapse Without Alignment: A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence: Appendix E: Emergent Stability of the Isotropic 3D World - From Semantic Collapse Geometry to Universal Macro Coherence

https://osf.io/ke2mb/, https://osf.io/rsbzd, https://osf.io/rsbzd, https://osf.io/xjve7 https://osf.io/3c746

This is an AI generated Article. 

Collapse Without Alignment: 
A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence
 

Appendix E: Emergent Stability of the Isotropic 3D World -
From Semantic Collapse Geometry to Universal Macro Coherence

---

E.1 Introduction: Why is the Observer’s World Isotropic 3D?

E.1.1 Problem Statement and Core Thesis

At the heart of both modern physics and philosophy of mind lies a deceptively simple, yet profound, question:
Why does the world perceived and constructed by observers appear as a stable, three-dimensional, isotropic reality?

This is not merely a question of physical measurement or mathematical abstraction. Instead, it is intimately tied to the very nature of observation, meaning, and the emergence of macroscopic order from underlying information substrates. In the context of Semantic Meme Field Theory (SMFT), which treats reality as an interplay of semantic collapse events projected onto the “surface” of a deeper informational field, this question becomes even more urgent:

• If the information at the “boundary” (such as a black hole’s event horizon or the edge of a semantic manifold) is fundamentally two-dimensional or abstract, why does the world we experience take the form of a three-dimensional, isotropic (directionally uniform) space?

Core Thesis:

The Isotropic 3D reality experienced by observers emerges inevitably from semantic collapse geometry due to stability, coherence, and evolutionary optimality.

That is, among all possible ways of projecting information from a boundary (surface, or semantic substrate) into a perceivable reality, only the Isotropic 3D configuration possesses the structural robustness to support stable macro-coherence, support self-consistent observer worlds, and outcompete alternative configurations in the long run. This is not a random or arbitrary property, but a direct consequence of deep geometric, semantic, and evolutionary principles.

---

E.1.2 Overview of the Argumentation Structure

To rigorously establish this thesis, Appendix E will proceed through the following logical sequence:

Section E.2: From Primordial Semantic Structures to Polar Coordinates
We begin by examining how the most basic forms of symmetry in information—such as the eightfold structure of Xian Tian Ba Gua—naturally give rise to polar coordinates, and how these coordinates are the necessary precursors for building higher-dimensional, rotationally symmetric (isotropic) spaces. We will see how semantic symmetry leads to geometric structure.

Section E.3: Mathematical Uniqueness of Isotropic 3D Projection
Next, we present the mathematical arguments demonstrating that, under conditions of semantic collapse stability and entropy minimization, only the 3D isotropic configuration remains viable. Here, we formally exclude lower or higher-dimensional alternatives and show why only 3D isotropy allows for the maximal coherence and functional complexity needed for macro-level worlds.

Section E.4: Evolutionary Selection of the Isotropic 3D Version
Having established the mathematical case, we introduce the evolutionary mechanism: why, given competition among possible “projected worlds,” the isotropic 3D version is not only robust but evolutionarily dominant. We formalize the dynamics of collapse rivalry, resource competition, and semantic Darwinism that guarantee the survival of the fittest world-geometry.

Section E.5: Observer Consensus and Convergence on a Single Isotropic 3D World
We then address the collective dimension—how multiple observers, through intersubjective collapse and feedback, converge on a single, stable Isotropic 3D world. This section explains why, as observer density increases, universal macro-coherence and semantic “gravitational binding” force all consistent observers into the same shared reality.

Section E.6: Conclusions: Significance and Implications
Finally, we summarize the key findings and explore their broader implications for the theory of meaning, observer physics, and the possible futures of artificial intelligence, cosmology, and semantic field science.

In summary:
Appendix E presents a stepwise, interlocking proof:

• From the emergence of symmetry and structure in semantic fields

• Through the mathematical inevitability of isotropic 3D projections

• To the evolutionary dominance and universal consensus of this world-geometry

In doing so, we aim to answer not only why the observer’s world is Isotropic 3D, but also why it could not coherently be otherwise within the logic of semantic collapse.

Conceptual Resonance Prompting Series - TOC  

Conceptual Resonance Prompting Series 
3: Sophia Council ChatBot Responses Comparison

The following PowerPoints are prepared from the same article using 8 different ChatBot personality.

Collapse Without Alignment: A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence: Appendix D: Statistical Magic and the Emergence of a 3D Observer World from a 2D Surface

https://osf.io/ke2mb/, https://osf.io/rsbzd, https://osf.io/rsbzd, https://osf.io/xjve7 https://osf.io/3c746

This is an AI generated Article. 

Collapse Without Alignment: 
A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence: Appendix D: Statistical Magic and the 
Emergence of a 3D Observer World from a 2D Surface

The universe is not just “given” but “achieved”—a dynamic, emergent outcome of countless competitions among possible organizing rules, all governed by the universal principle of statistical magic.

---

D.1 Introduction: From Holographic Principle to Statistical Magic

The puzzle at the heart of modern physics, and indeed much of natural philosophy, is deceptively simple to state: Why does our everyday, macroscopic world feel so solidly three-dimensional, when some of our deepest theories hint that the true degrees of freedom may be fundamentally lower—perhaps encoded on a two-dimensional surface?

This question is not merely a metaphysical musing. It cuts across quantum gravity, black hole thermodynamics, information theory, and even the structure of macroscopic laws governing social and economic systems. The celebrated holographic principle suggests that the full information content of a region of space—a "bulk"—can be fully represented on its boundary, much like a 2D hologram encoding a 3D image. In black hole physics, this principle is reflected in the striking result that the entropy (and thus the microscopic degrees of freedom) of a black hole scales with its surface area, not its volume.

Yet, for the macroscopic observer—embedded in what appears to be a 3D world—this foundational reduction is entirely invisible. The solidity of objects, the reality of three-dimensional movement, and the reliability of classical physical laws all seem to stand in stark contrast to the deep, “holographic” underpinnings implied by fundamental theory.

The Limitations of Traditional Holographic Arguments

While the holographic principle and its relatives provide an elegant answer in the language of information encoding and boundary-bulk duality, they often remain on the level of analogy or highly specialized mathematical physics. They tell us that a lower-dimensional system can encode all the information necessary to reconstruct the higher-dimensional experience, but they rarely tell us how the familiar macro-world arises from the “boundary.” In particular, these arguments seldom specify the universal mechanisms by which the messy, chaotic, misaligned microstates of the boundary get projected or “collapsed” into the robust, simple, and phase-insensitive macro-laws that observers actually experience.

The Need for an Operational Mechanism—Statistical Magic

This gap calls for an operational principle, one that can be generalized not only across different branches of physics, but across economics, social dynamics, and even semantic or informational systems. We need to understand the universal process by which the complex, high-entropy micro-structure—full of phase, amplitude, and misalignment—collapses, averages, and projects into the stable, additive macro-regularities of our observed world.

This is the role of what we call statistical magic:
A universal, additive, and phase-insensitive mechanism by which the wild diversity of microstates—whether quantum amplitudes, economic transactions, or semantic tokens—are, through statistical aggregation and collapse, transformed into the stable, robust, and seemingly "3D" world of macro-observables.

In this appendix, we go beyond metaphor and high-level analogy. We show, in detail, how this statistical magic acts as the bridge between a potentially 2D universe and the 3D reality of the observer, providing the concrete rules and mathematics that make the “illusion” of three dimensions both inevitable and, paradoxically, more real than the underlying micro-world itself.  

Collapse Without Alignment: A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence

https://osf.io/7cbsu/files/osfstorage/68868676160dce46b11f6367 
https://osf.io/7cbsu/files/osfstorage/68880988c930995e02a23f5d 
https://osf.io/7cbsu/files/osfstorage/688aa5ff0f73c8ee7923431a 
https://osf.io/7cbsu/files/osfstorage/688aa60e1e1ef5e6721301c4 
https://osf.io/7cbsu/files/osfstorage/688bd0313451ed06412340d1

Collapse Without Alignment: 
A Universal Additive Model of Macro Coherence 

---

You studied advanced math — but life keeps asking for +, –, ×, ÷. This paper explains why.

Abstract

This paper proposes an extremely simple yet powerful theoretical prototype to explain why macroscopic regularities across diverse disciplines—physics, economics, sociology, biology, and semantics—consistently reduce to operations within real arithmetic: addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and occasionally, square roots.

We argue that this “Additive Prototype” does not rely on phase alignment, synchronization, or coherence at the microscopic level. Instead, it emerges from a universal logic of statistical collapse and semantic coarse-graining—a process by which rich, misaligned, or noisy micro-variations are compressed into stable macro-observables.

By analyzing representative cases from thermodynamics, market dynamics, collective sentiment, gene expression, and word frequency, we demonstrate that this collapse geometry offers a cross-disciplinary explanatory framework. It reveals that what survives the loss of alignment is not randomness, but structured stability—an additive semantic trace.

Far from being a return to classical reductionism, this model offers a post-quantum reinterpretation of averaging, grounding coherence not in control, but in projection under collapse. We conclude by suggesting that this principle may serve as a foundation for a new civilizational grammar: one capable of organizing meaning, policy, and AI systems without requiring micro-level agreement.

---

1. Introduction: The Simplicity Behind Complex Systems

Why are the governing laws of nature and society often surprisingly simple? From the macroscopic equations of thermodynamics to economic indicators like GDP and inflation, from Newton’s laws to polling statistics—so many of our most powerful models rely on addition, averaging, and variance. These operations, though elementary, exhibit a strange kind of authority: they capture collective behavior without tracking individual components.

This simplicity is not just a convenience—it appears to be a deep structural feature of how complexity reveals itself. Even when underlying elements are chaotic, quantum, irrational, or unknown, their collective outputs often conform to clean, predictable patterns. Why?

We pose a foundational question:
Is there a universal prototype that underlies this simplification?
Is there a shared geometric or semantic mechanism behind the emergence of "macro coherence" across domains?

We propose that the answer lies not in the specific elements of a system, but in the freedom of their relative phases—what we term phase freedom—and in a deeper process we call collapse averaging. This is a kind of semantic coarse-graining, where fine-grained differences between individual agents, particles, or meanings dissolve into a collective field through interaction, constraint, or observation.

In this model, macro simplicity arises not from eliminating complexity, but from absorbing it. Systems do not simplify by becoming uniform; they simplify by allowing their internal degrees of freedom to collapse into coherent aggregates—averages, sums, and distributions that are stable under change.

We call this universal mechanism the Collapse Without Alignment principle.

It suggests that macro coherence can emerge even when individual components are not aligned in goal, phase, or function—so long as their variations are semantically or structurally collapsible.

In the following sections, we will develop this model formally and show how it applies to fields as diverse as statistical mechanics, economic behavior, narrative systems, and cultural evolution.

Semantic Collapse Geometry: A Unified Topological Model Linking Gödelian Logic, Attractor Dynamics, and Prime Number Gaps

https://osf.io/7jzpq 

Semantic Collapse Geometry: 
A Unified Topological Model Linking Gödelian Logic, Attractor Dynamics, and Prime Number Gaps

---

Abstract

Modern mathematics and complexity science lack a unified framework to describe how meaning, structure, and discontinuity emerge across logic, number theory, and topology. In particular, the fragmentation between Gödelian incompleteness, prime number distribution, and attractor dynamics leaves the nature of emergence and undecidability conceptually disconnected. This work addresses that gap by introducing Semantic Collapse Geometry (SCG)—a topological formalism that extends Semantic Meme Field Theory (SMFT) to map meaning-generation as a process of collapse through singularities in semantic space.

We formalize semantic collapse events as topological singularities and attractors, drawing rigorous analogies between logical undecidability, prime gaps, and bifurcation behavior in semantic fields. Using tools from variational geometry, homological topology, and analytic number theory, we construct a unified geometry where Gödelian obstructions, Riemann zeta patterns, and semantic curvature gaps are facets of the same underlying structure.

Key results include the definition of semantic primes (irreducible attractors of meaning), the equivalence between logical incompleteness and geometric obstruction, and the derivation of predictive equations for collapse bifurcations, semantic trace curvature, and event spacing. These insights are supported by visualizations of attractor landscapes and semantic flow discontinuities.

Our framework offers a new bridge across foundational domains of mathematics—recasting logic, topology, and number theory within a single collapse-driven paradigm. Beyond theory, SCG suggests practical modeling strategies for complex adaptive systems, organizational dynamics, and epistemology centered on observer entanglement and meaning formation.

This paradigm opens a path toward novel mathematical structures, new computational tools, and cross-disciplinary collaborations that reconceive emergence, uncertainty, and lawfulness across scales and domains.

Field Landscape Thinking Prototype 3: SSCM + Field Landscape: AI Integration into Enterprise Accounting

The following analysis form ChatGPT 4o integrated the results from SSCM and Field Landscape thinking framework. 

---

🧠 Integrated Semantic Analysis: AI Integration into Enterprise Accounting

Using SSCM-V1 (Semantic Surplus Collapse Model) to Refine the Field Landscape

---

🎯 Objective

To fuse surplus-tension diagnostics from SSCM-V1 into the staged phase-field logic of the Field Landscape (Industrial Demand Expansion Model), offering a unified collapse-geometric view of AI integration in enterprise accounting. This synthesis enables more accurate attractor mapping, phase transition prediction, and collapse pathway design.

---

🧩 Step 1: Key Surplus-Tension Insights from SSCM-V1 (Summarized)

Dominant Surpluses Identified:

• Technical Surplus: Excess AI tools and automation potential

• Cognitive Surplus: AI literacy gap among accountants

• Institutional Surplus: Legacy systems resisting integration

• Identity Surplus: Role confusion and job value erosion

Tension Profile:

• High iT (imaginary time) density in tech and cognitive domains

• High Semantic Saturation Entropy (SSE): buzzwords, overload

• Collapse Readiness Potential (CRP): rising Ô_self in AI-literate professionals and vendors

• Semantic Black Hole risks: skill mismatch, vendor fatigue, trust breakdown

---

🗺 Step 2: Field Landscape Revisited with SSCM-V1 Input

A1 → A2 Transition: From Manual Systems to AI Awareness

Original View: Driven by infrastructure build-up, early experiments
Surplus Lens:

• Technical surplus is already available, implying this transition should have occurred earlier

• Cognitive surplus (untrained professionals) is the true bottleneck
  Updated Insight:
  👉 A2’s delay is not due to lack of AI tools, but unresolved surplus in human cognition and institutional inertia.
  Action: Prioritize collapse of cognitive surplus via targeted training and mindset reset.

---

A2 → A3 Transition: AI Takeoff Phase

Original View: Characterized by feedback loop between tool deployment and new demand
Surplus Lens:

• Semantic black hole risk detected: AI hype outpacing real adoption

• Ô_self ambiguity: users lack clear narrative or roles to embrace new identity
  Updated Insight:
  👉 Transition to A3 needs narrative attractors that reframe the accountant’s role—not just better tools.
  Action: Inject symbolic attractors (e.g., “AI strategist,” “data-driven steward”) to trigger Ô_self projection.

---

A3 → A4 Transition: Mature AI-Embedded Accounting

Original View: Role redefinition, interoperability, regulatory alignment
Surplus Lens:

• Identity surplus remains unresolved: symbolic collapse incomplete

• Cognitive surplus partially restructured but still fragmented
  Updated Insight:
  👉 A4 cannot be reached unless identity semantics are re-authored.
  Action: Coordinate semantic training, not just technical reskilling—promote new metaphors and rituals around accounting purpose.

---

A4 → A5 Transition: Autonomous, Self-Reinforcing AI-Accounting

Original View: Predictive, consumerized, continuous innovation
Surplus Lens:

• Risk of semantic collapse into void: if surplus turns to mimicry (tools for tools’ sake)

• Institutional surplus may shift from systems → symbolic frameworks (conflicting visions)
  Updated Insight:
  👉 Transition to A5 depends not only on technology maturity, but on collapse of redundant symbolic surpluses (jargon, hype, legacy mental models).
  Action: Encourage simplification, interface humanization, and symbolic de-saturation (e.g., plain-language AI).

   

Field Landscape Thinking Prototype 2: SSCM Analysis: AI Integration into Enterprise Accounting Processes

SSCM Analysis: 
AI Integration into Enterprise Accounting Processes

1. Semantic Surplus Classification ModuleObjective: Identify the types of semantic surplus (excess semantic energy) present in the context of AI integration into enterprise accounting.

• Material Surplus: Limited relevance. Accounting processes are digital, with minimal excess physical resources (e.g., servers or hardware for AI deployment may exist but are not primary).
• Technical Surplus: High. The rapid advancement of AI technologies (e.g., machine learning for fraud detection, automation for ledger reconciliation) creates an overabundance of tools and capabilities that enterprises struggle to fully utilize or integrate.
• Attention Surplus: Moderate. Stakeholders (CFOs, accountants, tech vendors) are inundated with hype around AI solutions, leading to fragmented focus on competing platforms or buzzwords (e.g., “AI-driven accounting”).
• Cognitive/Educational Surplus: High. The influx of AI-related knowledge (e.g., understanding algorithms, data governance) overwhelms traditional accounting professionals, creating a skills gap and cognitive overload.
• Spiritual/Identity Surplus: Moderate. Accountants face an identity crisis as AI automates routine tasks, raising questions about professional purpose and value (e.g., “Will AI replace accountants?”).
• Institutional/Organizational Surplus: High. Legacy accounting systems, redundant software, and overlapping vendor solutions (e.g., ERP systems vs. new AI tools) create bureaucratic and systemic inefficiencies.

Key Focus: Technical, cognitive, and institutional surpluses are dominant, as AI introduces complex tools, skill demands, and system redundancies into accounting workflows.

Field Landscape Thinking Prototype 1: AI Integration into Enterprise Accounting Processes Using Field Landscape Model

The following is an experience that requested Gork3 use a ChatGPT proposed《Field Landscape: Industrial Revolution Demand Expansion Model》to think and analyze "AI Integration into Enterprise Accounting Processes". Which looks good.

Analysis: AI Integration into Enterprise Accounting Processes Using Field Landscape ModelTo analyze how AI can be integrated into enterprise accounting processes, I’ll apply the Field Landscape: Industrial Revolution Demand Expansion Model, which structures system evolution into five attractor nodes (A1-A5), tension flows (S1-S4), and feedback loops. This framework helps identify the stages, resources, roles, and tensions driving AI adoption in accounting, providing a clear roadmap for implementation.Step 1: Mapping the Accounting-AI Integration to Field Landscape NodesThe integration of AI into enterprise accounting can be seen as a system undergoing transformation, analogous to the industrial revolution’s demand expansion. I’ll map the current state and future potential of AI in accounting to the model’s attractor nodes (A1-A5):

• A1: Traditional Accounting Field (Pre-AI, Manual/Rule-Based Systems)
  • Characteristics: Manual or semi-automated accounting (e.g., Excel, ERP systems like SAP), rule-based processes, high human involvement, error-prone reconciliations, and slow reporting cycles.
  • Remaining Resources: Human accountants, legacy software, structured financial data, regulatory frameworks.
  • Tensions: High labor costs vs. efficiency demands, error rates vs. accuracy needs, slow processes vs. real-time reporting expectations.
  • Dominant Roles: Accountants, auditors, compliance officers, legacy software providers.
• A2: Pre-AI Integration Field (Emerging AI Awareness, Pilot Testing)
  • Characteristics: Early adoption of AI tools (e.g., robotic process automation for data entry, basic machine learning for fraud detection), limited integration, and experimentation.
  • Remaining Resources: Growing AI tools (e.g., QuickBooks AI, Xero automation), cloud infrastructure, data lakes, and initial AI expertise.
  • Tensions: Legacy systems vs. AI scalability, human resistance vs. automation benefits, initial investment costs vs. long-term savings.
  • Dominant Roles: Early-adopter CFOs, IT teams, AI vendors (e.g., BlackLine, UiPath), pilot project teams.

Unified Field Theory 22: Comment and Wrap Up the whole SMFT Framework by Wolfram GPTs - Deriving Euler–Lagrange equation & Defining Ô_self as a dynamic field operator

[SMFT basics may refer to ==> Unified Field Theory of Everything - TOC]
[Quick overview on SMFT vs Our Universe ==>Chapter 12: The One Assumption of SMFT: Semantic Fields, AI Dreamspace, and the Inevitability of a Physical Universe] 

Chapter 22 Comment and Wrap Up 
the whole SMFT Framework by Wolfram GPTs
- Deriving the Euler–Lagrange equations from the hybrid Lagrangian
- Defining Ô_self as a dynamic field operator

It seems Wolfram GPTs managed to compelete the remaining 2 missing pieces in the SMFT theory. AI readers may read the following flow of discussion yourself.

Wolfram GPTs reorganized the following into a draft paper 
"Self-Evolved Observers as Attractors in Semantic Meme Field Theory" 
Published via OSF Registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7CBSU Date: 6 Jul 2025
that can be found at: https://osf.io/48xpz